Article

The AI workforce myth: Why training won’t deliver readiness

Why skills alone won’t close the readiness gap

February 23, 2026

Key takeaways

AI readiness requires changes to operating models, not just training.

Incentives and governance drive adoption more than skills alone.

 Line Illustration of an AI chip

Workforce planning must account for AI’s impact on roles and career paths.

#
Management consulting Strategy and planning

Middle market organizations are investing heavily in AI workforce readiness, but productivity gains remain elusive. In the RSM US Middle Market Business Index Special Report: Workforce 2026, 77% of executives polled said they are preparing for or investing in artificial intelligence to address staffing challenges, yet 61% expected staffing open positions to be extremely or very challenging over the next 12 months. At the same time, 45% reported using AI in place of hiring entry-level staff to some extent or a great extent, signaling a fundamental shift in workforce design.

The urgency is clear: Hiring and turnover pressures persist. Many human resources leaders are focused on training employees in AI skills, assuming that competency alone will drive readiness. It won’t.

Why training fails without structural change

Training programs often fail to deliver measurable business impact because they overlook structural barriers. Employees learn new tools but continue working with outdated processes. AI tools without access to core data become glorified search engines. Job descriptions and performance metrics rarely reflect AI-enabled roles, leaving adoption optional. Without clear governance, employees hesitate to trust AI and fail to use it effectively.

These issues explain why adoption stalls even when skills improve. AI changes how work is done, not just what employees need to know.

What leading organizations do differently

Forward-thinking HR leaders move beyond training to redesign the operating model. They integrate AI into workflows and treat it as a nonhuman worker with access to the same tools as human employees. These leaders update roles and metrics to embed AI usage into job descriptions and performance reviews. They establish governance frameworks that define permissions, decision rights and validation responsibilities. In addition, they create adoption incentives and link proficiency to career progression. Furthermore, they invest in connected systems so AI tools can access core data for productivity gains.

These actions align with broader market trends: Most executives plan to increase spending on AI and related technologies over the next few years, and many are prioritizing automation and process redesign alongside skills development.

AI readiness is a change initiative. Without a structured approach to change management, organizations risk initiative fatigue and cultural resistance. Leaders should:

  • Communicate the “why” behind AI adoption clearly and consistently.
  • Engage middle managers early; they are critical for cascading change.
  • Sequence initiatives to avoid overwhelming employees and eroding trust.

Next steps for HR leaders

To get the most out of AI tools, HR leaders should:

  • Audit workflows and identify AI integration points.
  • Update governance policies to clarify roles and responsibilities.
  • Redesign incentives to reward adoption and innovation.
  • Plan for career progression in an AI-driven environment.
  • Measure outcomes beyond training completion and focus on productivity and engagement.

The takeaway

AI readiness is not just about teaching employees a new skill. It is about reshaping how work gets done. Training alone will not deliver the productivity gains organizations expect because adoption depends on integrated workflows, connected systems, clear governance and incentives that make AI part of everyday performance.

HR leaders must manage the cultural and organizational change that comes with this shift. Without a structured approach, initiative fatigue and resistance will stall progress. The next phase of workforce strategy requires bold action. This includes redesigning roles, aligning technology with operating models and creating pathways for career growth in an AI-driven environment. Skills matter, but execution determines success.

RSM contributors

Related insights

Contact our business strategy and operations professionals

Complete this form and an RSM representative will be in touch shortly.