Section 3 introduces the relief the IRS intends to provide and explains the scope of the proposed regulations. The central idea is to carve out a practical exception to FIRPTA for a narrow class of inbound F reorganizations—those involving publicly traded foreign corporations that become publicly traded domestic corporations. These transactions, referred to in the Notice as “covered inbound F reorganizations,” are viewed by the IRS as low risk from a policy standpoint. The concern is not that these transactions are being used to avoid U.S. tax, but rather that FIRPTA’s current rules impose unnecessary gain recognition and compliance burdens in situations where the underlying policy rationale does not apply.
To qualify as a covered inbound F reorganization, the transaction must meet three conditions:
- The foreign transferor corporation must have been publicly traded for the three years leading up to the reorganization.
- The resulting domestic corporation must be publicly traded for at least one year following the transaction.
- The transaction must not involve a distribution by the U.S. corporation of property (other than cash and stock in the U.S. corporation) to its shareholders within a year of the reorganization, unless the total value of such property is less than 1% of the foreign corporation’s asset value at the time of the reorganization.
These thresholds are designed to ensure that the relief applies only to genuine redomiciliation transactions—not to transactions that function as disguised sales or shareholder-level bailouts.
The proposed regulations will modify the FIRPTA rules under Temp. Reg. sections 1.897-5T and 1.897-6T to allow nonrecognition treatment for transfers of USRPI to the U.S. corporation and distributions of USRPHC stock to shareholders that occur in a covered inbound F reorganization.
The proposed regulations would allow the transfer of USRPI by the foreign corporation to the U.S. corporation to satisfy the requirement in Temp. Reg. section 1.897-6T(a) that it receive back USRPI to preserve nonrecognition even though the U.S. corporation is not a USRPHC immediately after the exchange.
The proposed regulations will also incorporate the publicly traded stock exception under section 897(c)(3), which provides that stock in a USRPHC is not treated as a USRPI if the shareholder owns 5% or less. The distribution of stock in a U.S. corporation, which is a USRPHC, by the foreign corporation to shareholders that own less than 5% will be treated as satisfying the requirement in Temp. Reg. section 1.897-5T(c)(4)(ii)(A) that the transferee be subject to U.S. tax on the USRPI received to preserve nonrecognition treatment. In other words, foreign shareholders whose ownership falls under the 5% threshold will be treated as satisfying the requirement that the transferee be subject to U.S. tax on the USRPI received—even though they are not actually subject to U.S. tax due to section 897(c)(3).
The proposed regulations would also clarify that the section 897(c)(3) exception would apply in calculating the FIRPTA toll charge which is required to qualify for an exception to gain recognition under Notice 89-85 and Notice 2006-46. More specifically, if a foreign transferor disposed of shares in the foreign corporation within 10 years of the reorganization, gain on that disposition would not be included in the toll charge calculation if the foreign transferor held 5% or less in the foreign corporation.
The IRS also proposes to ease the compliance burden by limiting the FIRPTA filing requirements to shareholders who do not qualify for the 5% exception. Foreign corporations will be required to make reasonable efforts to identify such shareholders—such as reviewing publicly available information—but will not be expected to track historical ownership or obtain declarations from every shareholder. This change is especially important for publicly traded corporations where shareholder turnover is frequent and ownership is dispersed.
Taken together, these changes reflect a shift in the IRS’ approach: rather than applying FIRPTA mechanically to all inbound reorganizations, the proposed rules would allow for a more tailored application that distinguishes between transactions that raise policy concerns and those that do not.