Article

ASC 740: Q1 2026 provision considerations

Accounting for income tax considerations for the first quarter of 2026

April 09, 2026
#
Federal tax Business tax Pillar two International tax

Executive summary: Updates and considerations for 2026 Q1 tax provisions

The first quarter of 2026 brought limited new tax legislation, but companies must account for changes under the OBBBA that are now effective, upcoming ARPA changes and evolving CAMT guidance and Pillar Two rules, all of which introduce potential permanent differences and tax reporting complexities. International developments across major jurisdictions – including Canada, France, Germany, India, Italy, Spain and the UK – add further compliance considerations for multinational groups.


Changes to permanent items effective for 2026

The OBBBA, enacted on July 4, 2025, contained several federal tax law changes that became effective in 2025, with other changes taking effect in 2026 or future years. The most notable changes impacting corporations for tax years beginning after Dec. 31, 2025, relate to charitable contributions and the limitation on executive compensation under section 162(m).

Charitable contributions

The OBBBA established a new 1% floor on the deductibility of charitable contributions, while retaining the 10% limitation that has existed for many years. If an entity makes a contribution in a given year that is less than 1% of its taxable income, the entire amount will be permanently disallowed. If the contribution is between 1% and 10% of its taxable income, any amount below 1% will be permanently disallowed. However, if the entity contributes greater than 10% of its taxable income, any disallowed deductions can be carried forward for five years, including the amount below the 1% floor.

Meals for employees

The OBBBA created an exception to the meal deduction limitations established by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) under section 274(o). The TCJA established a 100% disallowance of deductions for eating facilities operated by or meals provided to employees for the convenience of the employer, effective for amounts paid or incurred after Dec. 31, 2025. The OBBBA added an exception to section 274(o) for restaurants and fish processing facilities providing meals to their employees.

Executive compensation

The OBBBA expands the applicability of section 162(m), the limitation on executive compensation, by applying controlled group rules. This means that if the covered officer receives compensation from any of the controlled group members, those amounts must be aggregated for purposes of calculating the limitation. The limitation would then be allocated to the group members on a pro-rata basis, based on their share of compensation paid. These changes may be particularly relevant to public entities with partnerships in their structure, including Up-C structures.

On a related note, the ARPA of 2021 expands the definition of a ‘covered employee’ under section 162(m) to include the next five highest paid employees, with controlled group rules put in place by the OBBBA also applicable to these employees. While the ARPA change does not go into effect until 2027, entities will need to consider these additional employees when evaluating any future limitation of stock compensation or other deferred compensation arrangements that are currently being expensed for book purposes. As part of developing the annual effective tax rate, companies will need to evaluate current year compensation expense to determine amounts that would be deductible for tax purposes in future years (i.e., would generate a DTA as of Dec. 31, 2026) but ultimately are expected to be limited under section 162(m). Amounts that are expected to be limited under section 162(m) do not meet the definition of a temporary difference under Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 740.

The OBBBA established a new 1% floor on the deductibility of charitable contributions, while retaining the 10% limitation that has existed for many years. If an entity makes a contribution in a given year that is less than 1% of its taxable income, the entire amount will be permanently disallowed. If the contribution is between 1% and 10% of its taxable income, any amount below 1% will be permanently disallowed. However, if the entity contributes greater than 10% of its taxable income, any disallowed deductions can be carried forward for five years, including the amount below the 1% floor.

The OBBBA created an exception to the meal deduction limitations established by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) under section 274(o). The TCJA established a 100% disallowance of deductions for eating facilities operated by or meals provided to employees for the convenience of the employer, effective for amounts paid or incurred after Dec. 31, 2025. The OBBBA added an exception to section 274(o) for restaurants and fish processing facilities providing meals to their employees.

The OBBBA expands the applicability of section 162(m), the limitation on executive compensation, by applying controlled group rules. This means that if the covered officer receives compensation from any of the controlled group members, those amounts must be aggregated for purposes of calculating the limitation. The limitation would then be allocated to the group members on a pro-rata basis, based on their share of compensation paid. These changes may be particularly relevant to public entities with partnerships in their structure, including Up-C structures.

On a related note, the ARPA of 2021 expands the definition of a ‘covered employee’ under section 162(m) to include the next five highest paid employees, with controlled group rules put in place by the OBBBA also applicable to these employees. While the ARPA change does not go into effect until 2027, entities will need to consider these additional employees when evaluating any future limitation of stock compensation or other deferred compensation arrangements that are currently being expensed for book purposes. As part of developing the annual effective tax rate, companies will need to evaluate current year compensation expense to determine amounts that would be deductible for tax purposes in future years (i.e., would generate a DTA as of Dec. 31, 2026) but ultimately are expected to be limited under section 162(m). Amounts that are expected to be limited under section 162(m) do not meet the definition of a temporary difference under Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 740.

Key OBBBA changes to U.S. cross-border taxation, now effective

Foreign-derived deduction eligible income (FDDEI)


Effective Jan. 1, 2026, the FDDEI, formerly known as foreign-derived intangible income (FDII), deduction under section 250 is permanently reduced to 33.34%, resulting in an effective tax rate of about 14%. The calculation is simplified by removing the deemed tangible income return (DTIR), which may broaden the taxable base. In addition, interest expense and research & experimentation costs will no longer be allocated to deduction-eligible income for periods after Dec. 31, 2025.

Net CFC tested income (NCTI)


For NCTI, formerly known as global intangible low-taxed income (GILTI), the deduction under section 250 is permanently reduced to 40%, leading to an effective tax rate of approximately 12.6% effective Jan. 1, 2026. Similar to the FDDEI, the DTIR component is eliminated from the NCTI inclusion calculation.



 

Visit Global taxation reform: What changes to GILTI and FDII mean for multinationals for a detailed discussion on how FDDEI and NCTI interplay with domestic big three provisions.

Base erosion anti-abuse tax (BEAT)

The OBBBA modifies BEAT by setting a permanent rate of 10.5%, effective Jan. 1, 2026, and repealing previously scheduled post-2025 changes. As a result, taxpayers retain favorable treatment for certain credits, including research and development credits.

Most U.S. multinationals account for the above items as period items (i.e., the item affects current taxes only), which will impact the estimated annual effective tax rate (AETR) beginning in Q1 2026 for calendar year entities.

Foreign tax credits (FTC)

The OBBBA limits expense allocation to the NCTI basket to only directly allocable deductions and the related section 250 deduction, with all other expenses assigned to U.S.-source income. In parallel, the deemed paid FTC is increased from 80% to 90% for the NCTI basket, raising the foreign effective tax rate threshold to approximately 14% to eliminate residual U.S. tax, particularly when combined with reduced expense allocation. The OBBBA also introduces a matching limitation for previously taxed NCTI earnings, allowing only 90% of associated foreign taxes to be credited on distributions. Additionally, for FTC limitation purposes, up to 50% of income from foreign sales of U.S.-produced inventory may be treated as foreign-source income if attributable to a foreign fixed place of business, providing incremental relief from double taxation. These changes are also effective Jan. 1, 2026.

Controlled Foreign Corporation (CFC) income inclusion rules

IRS Fact Sheet 2025-09 confirms a change under OBBBA affecting the section 163(j) interest limitation. For tax years beginning after Dec. 31, 2025, a U.S. shareholder must exclude CFC income inclusions under sections 951(a), 951A(a) and 78, along with related deductions, from the calculation of adjusted taxable income (ATI). As a result, U.S. shareholders can no longer increase ATI by including these CFC income amounts by making CFC group elections, which may reduce their ability to deduct interest expense.

On March 18, 2026, the IRS issued Rev. Proc. 2026-17, providing transition guidance for taxpayers regarding the CFC group election under section 163(j). For the first specified period of a specified group beginning after Dec. 31, 2024, a designated U.S. person may make or revoke a CFC group election without regard to the 60‑month limitation. Any election made or revoked under this relief must otherwise satisfy the procedural requirements of Reg. section 1.163(j)-7(e)(5). The 60‑month limitation applies to all subsequent specified periods. Accordingly, if a CFC group election is made or revoked for a specified period ending December 2025, no further CFC group election may be made or revoked for any specified period beginning before Dec. 31, 2030.

For most entities, the provisions of the OBBBA that took effect in 2025 (i.e., changes to bonus depreciation, research and development expenditures and limitations on interest expense) did not have a direct impact on their effective tax rate (ETR). However, the changes related to charitable contributions, limitations on compensation under section 162(m), as well as the changes to the international tax-related items, are more likely to impact an entity’s calculation of the estimated AETR for the first quarter of 2026.

For a detailed discussion on the impacts of tax reform on financial reporting, read our article: Accounting for the income tax impacts of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.

Corporate alternative minimum tax (CAMT): Notice 2026-7

Notice 2026-7, released Feb. 18, 2026, adds additional taxpayer-friendly adjustments to the CAMT calculation. The notice added several new adjustments to the calculation of adjusted financial statement income (AFSI) that more closely align the calculation with federal taxable income, which are expected to impact a wide range of corporate entities. These changes include the following adjustments when calculating AFSI:

  • Amortization on domestic research and development costs capitalized under section 174 from 2022 through 2024.
  • Amortization of goodwill and ‘eligible’ section 197 intangible assets. An ‘eligible’ intangible is an intangible that is not amortized for book purposes but rather would be expensed upon impairment or disposal.
  • Certain repairs, maintenance, materials and supply costs, where these costs are capitalized for book purposes.

These adjustments were introduced by the Treasury largely in response to requests from entities that were more likely to pay CAMT in the future due to the changes to federal taxable income after the enactment of the OBBBA. In addition to the new AFSI adjustments, the notice provided clarity and guidance around the treatment of fresh start accounting adjustments and attribute reduction for companies emerging from bankruptcy and around the treatment of transfers of intangible property or stock to or from a foreign corporation for purposes of CAMT.

Under ASC 740, entities subject to CAMT should continue to measure their deferred taxes using the regular federal statutory tax rate of 21%; however, they may consider the effect of CAMT in assessing the need for a valuation allowance. Given the evolving nature of CAMT guidance, entities should continue to evaluate the impacts on any unrecognized tax benefits and the assessment of the need for a valuation allowance, if applicable. 

Tariffs

On Feb. 20, 2026, the Supreme Court ruled that the tariffs put in place as part of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) were unlawful, and on March 5, 2026, the US Court of International Trade issued an order that could result in refunds of tariffs previously paid by importers. The impacts of this decision are wide-ranging, complex and uncertain. To read more about the potential impacts and uncertainties, read our Accounting Brief: Update on Potential Tariff Refunds.  

Updates from Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)

The FASB did not issue any new accounting standards updates (ASUs) during the first quarter of 2026, but that does not mean that there is no work to be done. Some of the ASUs issued in 2025 and recent years are effective for years beginning after Dec. 15, 2025, generally calendar year 2026, including the following:

  • ASU 2025-05 – Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses for Accounts Receivable and Contract Assets
  • ASU 2024-04 – Debt – Debt with Conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470-20): Induced Conversions of Convertible Debt Instruments

Additionally, many of the other ASUs issued in 2025 allow for early adoption.

It is not often that these updates are directly related to ASC 740, but it is crucial for tax professionals to stay attuned to these updates as changes to pre-tax income may affect the income tax provision. 

In December of 2025, the FASB finalized ASU 2025-10, Government Grants (Topic 832): Accounting for Government Grants Received by Business Entities. Read more about the ASU and the impact on entities in RSM US’ Financial Reporting Insights: FASB issues guidance on accounting for government grants.

State tax

A significant number of states have adopted legislation in Q1 2026 in response to the OBBBA. The results vary widely from state to state, potentially adding complexity to state tax calculations for the foreseeable future. Companies should monitor these changes closely throughout the year, and updates on state law changes for Q1 are discussed in State corporate income tax law changes for the first quarter of 2026

Global tax compliance updates: OECD Pillar Two and country-specific changes

The following section includes key global tax law updates contributed by RSM’s global teams. 

Status of Pillar Two

The OECD’s January 2026 ‘side-by-side’ (SbS) package introduces a coordinated framework that allows U.S.-parented multinational enterprises to coexist with Pillar Two global minimum tax rules while significantly reducing exposure to top-up taxes. Effective for fiscal years beginning on or after Jan. 1, 2026, the package provides elective safe harbors, most notably the SbS and ultimate parent entity (UPE) safe harbors, that can effectively eliminate liability under the income inclusion rule (IIR) and undertaxed profits rule (UTPR) for eligible U.S. groups. Additional measures, including a permanent simplified effective tax rate safe harbor, an extension of transitional country-by-country (CbC) reporting relief, and a substance-based tax incentive safe harbor, are intended to streamline compliance and preserve the intended 15% minimum tax framework while recognizing the U.S. tax system as broadly aligned with Pillar Two objectives.

While the package represents a significant policy shift, its financial reporting impact will depend on jurisdictional enactment. U.S. multinationals may still face interim volatility where top-up taxes must be accrued prior to local enactment of the SbS rules, even if ultimately relieved upon enactment. Importantly, the relief does not extend to qualified domestic minimum top-up taxes (QDMTTs), and companies must continue to meet global anti-base erosion (GloBE) reporting requirements and invest in data, governance and modeling capabilities. As such, the package reduces global minimum tax exposure but does not eliminate compliance complexity, requiring continued monitoring of legislative developments and proactive planning around elections, incentives, and reporting positions. Visit OECD's ‘side-by-side’ package offers a path for US multinational enterprises for detailed discussions.

As of March 2026, most jurisdictions have not enacted legislation implementing the SbS Package. While the European Union (EU) has formally acknowledged the SbS package as a qualifying safe harbor framework under the EU Minimum Tax Directive, application of the SbS provisions generally requires national level legislative or administrative implementation by individual member states. The United Kingdom announced on Jan. 7, 2026, its intention to implement the SbS package with effect for accounting periods beginning on or after Jan. 1, 2026; however, legislation is expected to be introduced in the next Finance Bill which is likely to be enacted in the Spring of 2027.

RSM contributors

Tax resources

Timely updates and analysis of changing federal, state and international tax policy and regulation.

Subscribe now

Stay updated on tax planning and regulatory topics that affect you and your business.

Washington National Tax

Experienced tax professionals track regulations, policies and legislation to help translate changes.