Optimizing federal grant management: 7 priorities for today’s state and local governments
Federal grant programs have undergone significant changes in recent years and continue to evolve under the current Administration. At the same time, state and local governments are managing unprecedented levels of federal funding across a broad spectrum of initiatives—including infrastructure, broadband, public health, water systems, housing, education and emergency response. While agencies face growing demands for transparency, compliance and performance reporting, many are simultaneously navigating staffing shortages, evolving federal rules, and increasingly complex documentation and monitoring obligations.
The core principles of strong grant management remain the same: sound procurement practices, well-organized records and consistent internal controls. But the landscape has changed significantly since 2021. New federal regulations, heightened oversight expectations, and the growing availability of advanced analytics and automation now shape how governments must manage grants. Below are seven priorities that eligible entities should consider as they work to strengthen compliance and improve operational efficiency.
1. Stay current with evolving federal rules and Uniform Guidance updates
The federal framework for grant administration—2 CFR Part 200, also known as Uniform Guidance—has undergone substantial revision, including updated procurement requirements, cost principles and audit thresholds. These updates affect how state and local governments must structure their policies, document procurement actions, determine cost reasonableness and prepare for single audits.
Recent changes emphasize clarity in documentation, expanded definitions and greater consistency in how award requirements are interpreted. Governments should ensure their procurement policies, cost allocation procedures and internal controls reflect the current rule set, particularly for sole-source justifications, contract provisions and cost analyses. Reviewing policies annually and aligning them with the updated Uniform Guidance can help reduce audit findings and position agencies to manage future funding more effectively. Program-specific requirements must also be considered, including waivers and exceptions to the Uniform Guidance, as approved and where applicable.
2. Strengthen oversight, monitoring and audit readiness
Oversight of federal funds has increased substantially across all major programs. State and local governments are experiencing more frequent inquiries from federal awarding agencies, inspectors general and auditors, particularly for expenditures tied to emergency response, infrastructure programs and large subrecipient portfolios.
Common areas of noncompliance continue to include:
- Insufficient procurement documentation or unsupported use of noncompetitive methods
- Missing or incomplete supporting documentation for expenditures
- Lack of consistent subrecipient monitoring documentation
- Outdated internal controls that do not reflect current requirements
State and local entities should maintain documentation in a centralized location, designate clear roles for grant oversight and prepare for audit inquiries by ensuring invoices, contracts, cost analyses, labor documentation and subrecipient files are complete and well organized. Strengthening monitoring procedures now—especially for high-risk subrecipients—reduces the risk of questioned costs later.
3. Adopt digital tools to manage growing program complexity
The volume, diversity and duration of federal grants have increased, making manual systems such as spreadsheets more difficult to sustain. Studies consistently show that spreadsheets have high error rates, particularly when multiple staff members handle data or when files are copied between systems.
Many governments are now adopting digital platforms or cloud-based tools to:
- Centralize grant portfolios
- Track expenditures, match supporting documentation and prepare reports
- Apply consistent coding and naming conventions
- Improve visibility into obligations and remaining balances
- Reduce the risk of duplication of benefits
- Maintain audit trails for contract and financial actions
Technology alone is not a solution, but it can help agencies manage large portfolios more effectively and prepare accurate reimbursement requests. For organizations without the capacity to implement enterprise systems, low-code tools and modular solutions can still significantly improve data reliability and workflow consistency.
4. Leverage automation and artificial intelligence to enhance compliance
Automation and AI-enabled tools now play a growing role in reducing administrative burden and improving compliance. These solutions can assist state and local governments by:
- Reviewing expenditure documentation against grant requirements
- Detecting anomalies or potential noncompliance before reimbursement requests are submitted
- Extracting data from invoices and receipts to reduce manual entry
- Standardizing subrecipient monitoring criteria
- Routing documents and tasks through approval workflows
Early adopters have reported substantial reductions in manual review time and improved accuracy of spending reports. While these tools do not replace human judgment, they can strengthen first-level reviews, reduce errors and support more consistent application of federal rules. For governments with limited staff capacity, automation can also help ensure continuity during turnover or periods of increased workload.
5. Maintain strong cybersecurity and data governance practices
As more grant documentation, expenditure records, procurement files and monitoring materials move into digital systems, state and local governments must ensure those systems meet modern data-protection expectations. Federal awarding agencies increasingly expect recipients to safeguard sensitive information, manage system access appropriately and align documentation with recognized standards.
Governments should evaluate:
- Who can access grant-related data and systems
- Whether records retention protocols align with federal requirements
- How digital documentation is stored, labeled and backed up
- Whether systems adhere to current security and privacy best practices
Cybersecurity considerations now intersect directly with grant compliance. A well-structured data governance framework can support both audit readiness and long-term transparency.
6. Meet new reporting and performance-measurement expectations
Several major federal programs—including those funded through the American Rescue Plan Act, the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, and subsequent funding initiatives—require more granular and frequent reporting than traditional federal grants. Many programs also emphasize performance outcomes and measurement of results, not simply documentation of expenditures.
State and local agencies should ensure they can:
- Track progress toward performance goals
- Maintain documentation that links expenditures to specific activities or outputs
- Compile data for quarterly or annual reports
- Demonstrate alignment between spending and intended outcomes
Embedding performance tracking into day-to-day grant administration helps governments produce timely and accurate reports and respond to federal inquiries with confidence.
7. Invest in grant-management workforce training and capacity
The increasing complexity of federal programs and reporting requirements has elevated the need for training, standardized procedures and clear roles within grant-managing teams. Staff must understand procurement requirements, cost principles, documentation standards, subrecipient monitoring and performance reporting.
Governments should consider:
- Establishing recurring training for procurement, finance and program staff
- Creating or updating grant management manuals or process guides
- Implementing standardized templates for documentation and monitoring
- Designating cross-functional grant teams to improve coordination
When paired with modern tools and clear governance structures, a well-trained workforce forms the foundation of strong compliance and effective grant management.
