Pre-Wayfair nexus analysis addresses physical presence
The decision
RockAuto maintained an auto parts e-commerce website throughout the audit period of April 1, 2023 to April 30, 2019. In lieu of holding its own inventory, RockAuto required distributors to provide product inventories which RockAuto then listed on its website. Orders placed through the website were forwarded to the distributors for fulfillment in compliance with RockAuto’s shipping and return policies. Pursuant to RockAuto’s contracts, the Arizona distributors agreed to package online orders with RockAuto branded tape, include a RockAuto promotional magnet in the orders, ship the orders via mail or common carrier, and accept customer returns. The tape, magnets and boxes were provided by RockAuto, as well as return labels. Distributors were also prohibited from selling products directly through the distributor’s own website, a website the distributor controlled, or a third-party’s website.
When there were multiple brands of the same part available, and the customer intended to purchase multiple items, RockAuto’s website allowed customers to click “Choose for Me to Minimize Cost,” which would select the brand that would ship for the lowest total cost. However, customers were not aware of the use of the distributors or the location of the warehouses.
Under a pre-Wayfair analysis, RockAuto argued that it had not established the necessary physical presence to create substantial nexus in Arizona. After reviewing U.S. Supreme Court and Arizona nexus case law, the Court of Appeals found that RockAuto established physical presence in Arizona such that it was responsible for transaction privilege taxes for sales to Arizona customers. The Court determined that the distributor’s activities were significantly associated with RockAuto’s ability to establish and maintain an in-state market by relying on the distributors to maintain inventory, ship orders to Arizona customers, accept returns, and use RockAuto promotional materials. Additionally, the Court noted that RockAuto’s business model was designed to increase customer satisfaction by reducing shipping times and costs for customers, further helping to establish and maintain a market in the state. Accordingly, essential portions of RockAuto’s contracts were performed by the distributors in Arizona.
RockAuto argued that its in-state activities were insignificant since almost 90% of orders from Arizona distributors shipped to out-of-state customers, and over 80% of orders to Arizona customers came from out-of-state distributors. The Court rejected this argument, stating that the number of Arizona transactions and customers did not dictate whether a taxpayer had physical presence. Furthermore, the Court noted that four Arizona business trips to meet with distributors within the six-year audit period supported a finding of physical presence.
Takeaways
While market activities can establish substantial nexus in the post-Wayfair environment, this decision serves as a good reminder that physical presence through employees, inventory and offices can also create nexus. Although physical presence may no longer be required under the U.S. Constitution, maintaining physical presence through actual presence, or expanded presence through affiliate nexus, will establish sales and use tax nexus in most states. Additionally, Arizona has enforced an economic sales tax nexus threshold since 2019. Currently, remote sellers with over $100,000 of gross sales in the previous or current year establish economic nexus and must adhere to all transaction privilege tax compliance obligations including registration, collection and filing. For more information on the decision, please reach out to your Arizona state and local tax advisers. For more information on the current state of sales and use tax nexus, please read our article, Wayfair turns five: A coming of age story.
