Article

ERP scope planning: How CFOs avoid failure before implementation

The importance of focusing on systems rather than business outcomes

February 23, 2026

Key takeaways

Line Illustration of a computer

ERP failures often stem from poor scoping and unclear business outcomes.

Over-customization creates technical debt and long-term risk so fit-to-standard should be the default approach.

Adoption and change management are as critical as system design.

#
Management consulting Strategy and planning

Most enterprise resource planning (ERP) failures do not happen during testing or go-live. They are locked in during scoping. The decisions finance leaders make in the first 30 to 60 days determine whether ERP functions as a growth platform or becomes a long-term liability. When finance leaders treat ERP as a system upgrade rather than a business transformation, projects stall, costs rise and value dissipates.

Why scoping is difficult

Defining ERP scope is complex because it touches every part of the business. Common challenges include the following:

  • Rapid scope expansion when governance is weak

  • Over-customization that creates technical debt and long-term risk

  • Finance teams managing ERP work in addition to their daily jobs

  • Change management is reduced to control costs

  • Data migration complexity and blackout periods ignored

These issues compound quickly, leading to missed deadlines, frustrated teams and systems that fail to deliver intended benefits.

How leading finance teams get it right

High-performing organizations take a disciplined approach to ERP scoping. Best practices include the following:

  • Starting with business outcomes, not features

  • Defaulting to fit-to-standard and customizing only for true differentiation

  • Phasing transformation, beginning with a minimum viable product

  • Enforcing leadership guardrails to manage trade-offs

  • Treating adoption as a core scope element, not an add-on

  • Conducting a finance rapid assessment before ERP selection

  • Mapping blackout periods into the project timeline

  • Embedding governance into the project charter
     

Company leaders can take practical steps to get the most out of their investment. These steps include the following:

  • Running a rapid finance assessment to identify process gaps and readiness

  • Defining scope guardrails and decision criteria

  • Aligning leadership on trade-offs between timeline, cost and functionality

The takeaway

ERP success depends on disciplined scoping, strong governance and a relentless focus on adoption. When finance leaders prioritize outcomes over features and limit over-customization, they create a foundation for sustainable transformation.

The cost of misaligned ERP decisions is significant. The payoff for getting it right is higher: a platform that drives real business value and positions finance for long-term growth.

Related insights

Contact our business strategy and operations professionals

Complete this form and an RSM representative will be in touch shortly.