Vendors support the payroll tool, but employers own the configuration and accuracy.
Vendors support the payroll tool, but employers own the configuration and accuracy.
Test payroll configurations year-round to avoid costly year-end corrections.
Configuration issues build quietly all year and often surface only at year-end.
The year 2026 is a turning point for middle market payroll compliance. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) has introduced sweeping changes to how middle market organizations report wages, tips and overtime, while the IRS has sharpened scrutiny of information returns and payee statements. For employers, this means proving those rules are correctly built into every payroll system, pay cycle and Form W-2 (Wage and Tax Statement).
Compliance is a shared responsibility, but vendor functionality does not replace employer-specific validation. A payroll provider can deliver a solution for Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)-qualified overtime or the mandatory Roth catch-up tied to Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA) wage thresholds, but accuracy still depends on configuration. The same holds true for Savings Incentive Match Plan for Employees (SIMPLE) plans: SIMPLE 401(k)s and SIMPLE IRAs (individual retirement accounts) carry distinct limits and rules, and relying on a vendor to account for them can be costly. Human resources, payroll, tax and finance each play a role in the validation process.
The time to prepare is now: Review payroll calendars, initiatives, organizational changes and system configurations early, and validate the full process end to end. Ongoing testing can help identify gaps sooner and reduce costly year-end corrections.
View RSM’s webinar, "Payroll reporting risk: Year-end 2026 required changes," where RSM tax and payroll professionals detail evolving OBBBA and SECURE 2.0 Act reporting requirements, common configuration pitfalls and how middle market organizations can prepare for accurate, compliant year-end reporting.
Middle market organizations are facing a more complex reporting environment, with new tax and benefits requirements and increased regulatory scrutiny. For 2026 and beyond, employers should consider the following:
Late, incomplete or incorrect information returns and payee statements can result in penalties. For 2026:
In addition, willfully fraudulent W-2 forms may result in civil damages of $5,000 or more and potential criminal penalties.
The IRS provided limited penalty relief for tax year 2025 as employers adapted to new OBBBA reporting requirements.
The relief applied when otherwise complete and correct returns and statements were filed and furnished. It covered the failure to separately report:
The relief did not cover failures to file or furnish returns or statements or incorrect aggregate amounts. In addition, going forward, it does not apply to 2026.
Employers should validate payroll and reporting processes by:
It is important to test your calculations against payroll and time records, reconcile the results to your employment tax returns, and establish an early correction and filing timeline. Validate early rather than react at year-end.
Regulatory changes are converging across tax, payroll and benefits, creating additional areas of risk, particularly for middle market organizations that rely heavily on vendor systems.
A common misconception is that vendors are fully responsible for compliance and accurate programming. However, in practice, vendors provide tools that support payroll processing and compliance but may not account for employer-specific rules, policies or requirements.
Employers are ultimately responsible for validating their data and system configuration accuracy, though the scope of that responsibility varies by employer. This validation should happen end to end, with employers working with vendors to review tax filings and mock W-2s where available, since small configuration gaps can create broader compliance issues and affect employees.
Common reporting gaps include:
Just because payroll looks good and your employees are being paid correctly doesn’t necessarily mean that’s flowing over to your quarterly tax filing accurately, or that it’s going to flow over to your W-2 accurately.
SECURE 2.0 changes affect payroll setup and how employee contributions flow to plan recordkeepers. Therefore, employers should review:
Understand your plan and payroll capabilities, then coordinate across HR, payroll, finance, vendors and recordkeepers to apply them consistently. It is critical to set clear thresholds and controls and validate configurations regularly.
Accurate reporting starts with proper configuration, data mapping and a clear understanding of dependencies across tax, payroll, timekeeping and benefits. Misalignment can lead to reporting errors.
Do not wait until December: By year-end, employers may be correcting issues rather than preventing them. Review and test configurations throughout the year for a smoother year-end process.
A common misconception is that a vendor’s solution automatically ensures compliance. In reality, vendor functionality is only as accurate as the configuration and data behind it.
For example, employers should evaluate how their vendor’s OBBBA overtime reporting solution applies to their specific payroll practices:
The key principle is simple: The vendor provides the tool, but the employer is responsible for its configuration and the resulting compliance outcomes.
In addition, configuration issues can build quietly throughout the year and surface only at year-end. Therefore, employers should maintain ongoing oversight of the following critical areas:
Year-end readiness isn’t an event. It’s the result of the configuration, validation and governance decisions you make throughout the year.
Review payroll configuration, employee data, tax setup, system integrations and reporting requirements, testing changes early to identify and address gaps.
Employers remain responsible for validating payroll configuration, data and reporting accuracy. Vendor systems should be tested to confirm they support accurate results.
As middle market payroll requirements continue to evolve, proactive planning, clear ownership and strong internal controls can help reduce year-end risks. Reviewing payroll processes, system configurations and upcoming changes throughout the year gives employers time to test updates, address gaps and work with vendors as needed.
A readiness assessment can help decision makers identify gaps in processes, documentation, system configuration and ownership.
Ready to get started? RSM’s payroll professionals can help you assess payroll readiness, identify configuration and process gaps, and prepare for year-end reporting requirements.