Presentation of defined benefit costs
FINANCIAL REPORTING INSIGHTS |
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) recently issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2017-07, Compensation — Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost, to improve guidance related to the presentation of defined benefit costs in the income statement. Under generally accepted accounting principles, defined benefit pension cost and postretirement benefit cost (net benefit cost) comprise several components that reflect different aspects of an employer’s financial arrangements, as well as the cost of benefits provided to employees. Those components are aggregated for reporting in the financial statements. Stakeholders had observed that the current presentation of defined benefit cost on a net basis combines elements that are heterogeneous. This reduces transparency and makes it more costly for investors and other users to analyze and understand that information.
ASU 2017-07 addresses these issues by requiring an employer to report the service cost component in the same line item or items as other compensation costs arising from services rendered by the pertinent employees during the period. It also provides explicit guidance requiring presentation of the other components of net benefit cost in the income statement separately from the service cost component and outside a subtotal of income from operations, if one is presented. If a separate line item or items are used to present the other components of net benefit cost, that line item or items must be appropriately described. If a separate line item or items are not used, the line item or items used in the income statement to present the other components of net benefit cost must be disclosed.
The ASU also allows only the service cost component of net benefit cost to be eligible for capitalization when applicable (for example, as a cost of internally manufactured inventory or a self-constructed asset).
The ASU is effective for public business entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those annual periods. For other entities, the ASU is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of an annual period for which financial statements (interim or annual) have not been issued or made available for issuance. Disclosures of the nature of and reason for the change in accounting principle are required in the first interim and annual periods of adoption.
The ASU should be applied retrospectively for the presentation of the service cost component and the other components of net periodic pension cost and net periodic postretirement benefit cost in the income statement and prospectively, on and after the effective date, for the capitalization of the service cost component of net periodic pension cost and net periodic postretirement benefit in assets. The ASU allows a practical expedient that permits an employer to use the amounts disclosed in its pension and other postretirement benefit plan note for the prior comparative periods as the estimation basis for applying the retrospective presentation requirements. Disclosure that the practical expedient was used is required.