United States

Employers face new penalties on health plans under the ACA

IRS begins assessing employer shared responsibility payments

INSIGHT ARTICLE  | 

The IRS has announced that it is ready to start assessing employer shared responsibility payments on large employers that do not offer health coverage that meets Affordable Care Act (ACA) standards. The IRS intends to issue letters to large employers in late 2017, imposing penalties for the 2015 calendar year.

Background

Starting in 2015, large employers that fail to offer employee health insurance that meets ACA standards may be assessed a shared responsibility payment by the IRS. The payment, commonly known as the “pay or play” penalty, applies to for-profit and non-profit organizations, including churches and governmental entities. The IRS determines which large employers owe the penalty based on information from the employer’s Forms 1095-C and 1094-C and its employees’ individual income tax returns.

Determining large employer status

A large employer is defined under the ACA as an employer with an average of at least 50 full-time employees (including full-time equivalents) during the preceding calendar year. Therefore, an employer must determine if it meets the 50-employee threshold for the current calendar year by evaluating its workforce for the prior calendar year.

Making this determination can be complex because employees of entities in an aggregated group are added together to determine whether the 50-employee threshold is met. Thus, a company with fewer than 50 full-time employees could be a large employer due to being in an aggregated group with other companies. If considered a large employer, the company would be subject to the ACA shared responsibility payment rules and the Forms 1095-C/1094-C filing requirements even though it has fewer than 50 full-time employees. An employer filing Form 1094-C must disclose to the IRS the names and EINs of the other employers in its aggregated group.

There are several types of aggregated groups:

  • A parent-subsidiary group exists when one company owns at least 80 percent of one or more other companies.
  • Brother-sister groups occur when five or fewer individuals, estates or trusts own at least 80 percent of two or more entities and have more than 50 percent identical ownership of those entities.
  • Tax-exempt organizations could be in an aggregated group if at least 80 percent of the directors or trustees of one organization are representatives of or controlled by another organization.
  • Firms that provide services, including health care, law, engineering, accounting, and other services, might be in an aggregated group if the firms have common owners, provide services for each other, or work together to provide services to customers.
  •  Any firm whose principal source of revenue comes from managing another company (including any affiliates) can be in an aggregated group with the company.

When various members of the same family own two or more companies, many assume that the companies are automatically an aggregated group. However, that is not the case. The ownership interests of each family member must be carefully analyzed to determine if the IRS standards for aggregated group status are met. Because many special rules apply, taxpayers should consult with their tax advisors when making aggregated group determinations.  

Example: George and his two adult children, Carol and Kevin, own 100 percent of Company A and Company B as follows: 

penalties affordable heatlhcare act

Based on this ownership structure, A and B are an aggregated group, and the companies’ employees are added together for purposes of the 50-employee threshold. Since the group has 75 employees, both companies are considered large employers even though each company individually has fewer than 50 employees. Consequently, both companies are subject to the ACA shared responsibility payment rules and the Forms 1095-C/1094-C filing requirements.

Suppose the ownership of Company B was split differently among the family members:

penalties affordable heatlhcare act

In this case, even though the same three family members own both companies, A and B are not an aggregated group under the IRS rules. Therefore, the employees of the two companies are not added together for ACA purposes. Since each company has less than 50 full-time employees, neither company is a large employer. Consequently, both companies are exempt from the ACA shared responsibility payment rules and the Forms 1095-C/1094-C filing requirements.

To count the number of employees for the 50-employee threshold, employers need to determine how many employees worked, on average, at least 30 hours per week during the preceding calendar year. The hours for employees who worked less than 30 hours per week are added together and divided by 120 to determine the number of full-time equivalent employees. For example, two part-time employees each working 15 hours per week would constitute one full-time equivalent employee. Special rules apply to seasonal employees.

ACA standards for health coverage

If a large employer wants to avoid the “pay or play” penalty, it must offer employee health coverage that meets three ACA requirements: (1) minimum essential coverage, (2) minimum value, and (3) affordability.

Minimum essential coverage. First, the ACA requires that the employer offer minimum essential coverage to at least 95 percent of its full-time employees and their dependents. Most insured or self-insured group health plans will constitute minimum essential coverage. The coverage must be offered to 95 percent (70 percent for 2015 only) of employees working, on average, at least 30 hours per week and their children up to age 26. Part-time employees working less than 30 hours per week are not required to be offered coverage. Interestingly, spouses are not considered dependents for this purpose; therefore, employers are not required to offer coverage to spouses in order to avoid the penalty. 

If a large employer fails to meet the minimum essential coverage requirement, it could be assessed a penalty equal to the number of its full-time employees for the year (minus up to 30 employees, or for 2015 only, 80 employees) times $2,000 if at least one full-time employee purchases health coverage with premium tax credits through the Health Insurance Marketplace (also known as the exchange). No penalty is imposed for failing to offer coverage to part-time employees working less than 30 hours per week. This nondeductible penalty is imposed by month and is indexed for inflation. The penalty is $2,080 ($173.33 per month) for 2015, $2,160 ($180 per month) for 2016, and $2,260 ($188.33 per month) for 2017. 

Example: In 2015 and 2016, Company X offers a group health plan to its 280 full-time employees working in Arizona but does not offer coverage to its 20 full-time employees or five part-time employees working in other states. One full-time employee purchases health coverage through the Marketplace with premium tax credits. Since Company X is offering health coverage to 93 percent (280/300) of its full-time employees, it would not be subject to a penalty for 2015 since its meets the 70 percent threshold for that year. However, it does not meet the 95 percent threshold and could face a nondeductible penalty for 2016 of $583,200 ((300 full-time employees – 30 employees) x $2,160).

Employers in an aggregated group are considered separately for penalty purposes. However, the 30-employee exclusion is prorated among the companies in the group based on the respective numbers of full-time employees. Each company is responsible for maintaining a health plan that meets ACA standards or paying a penalty based on its workforce. One company’s failure to maintain an ACA-compliant health plan does not trigger penalties for the other companies in the group. 

Minimum value. Second, the ACA requires that health coverage meet a minimum value requirement. A health plan meets the minimum value requirement if it covers certain types of medical expenses and is designed to pay at least 60 percent of employees’ health care costs, with employees picking up the remaining 40 percent through deductibles and copays. An employer can determine if this minimum value standard is met by reviewing its Summary of Benefits and Coverage document or asking its health insurance carrier or third-party administrator. Alternatively, an employer can determine the value itself using a calculator created by the government or could engage an actuary to determine the value. Since an employer is required to certify on Form 1095-C whether its health plan meets the minimum value standard, it is important that every large employer have written documentation supporting the plan's minimum value.

Affordability. Third, the ACA requires each health plan to meet an affordability standard, which limits the amount an employer can charge an employee for self-only coverage. There is no limit on the amount an employer can charge for other levels of coverage, such as family coverage. To be affordable, the employee’s cost for self-only coverage cannot exceed 9.5 percent of one of the following safe harbors: (1) the employee’s wages in box 1 of Form W-2, (2) the employee’s rate of pay, or (3) the federal poverty level. This percentage is indexed for inflation and is increased to 9.56 percent for 2015, 9.66 percent for 2016, and 9.69 percent for 2017.

Failure to meet either the minimum value or the affordability requirement could subject an employer to a nondeductible $3,000 annual penalty for each full-time employee who purchases health insurance coverage on the Marketplace with premium tax credits. This penalty rises to $3,120 ($260 per month) for 2015, $3,240 ($270 per month) for 2016, and $3,390 ($282.50 per month) for 2017. For example, if an employer offers a health plan to its 300 full-time employees that does not meet the minimum value standard and 12 of those employees purchase coverage on the Marketplace with premium tax credits, the employer’s penalty for 2016 would be $38,880 (12 full-time employees x $3,240). 

Paying the penalty

Large employers that do not have ACA-compliant health coverage will owe a penalty if any of their full-time employees report a premium tax credit on their individual income tax returns for health insurance they purchase through the Health Insurance Marketplace. Employers are not required to calculate the employer shared responsibility payment on any tax return that they file. Instead, the IRS will mail them a notice of their tax liability and give them an opportunity to respond before a demand for payment is made. 

The IRS will determine if an employer owes a shared responsibility payment based on information obtained from Forms 1095-C and 1094-C and employees’ Forms 1040. If the IRS determines that a payment is owed, it will mail the employer Letter 226J detailing the penalty amount by month. Employers have 30 days to respond and can either pay the penalty or send the IRS an explanation of why it does not agree with the assessment. The IRS will acknowledge the employer’s response via Letter 227. If the employer still disagrees with any proposed employer shared responsibility payment, it can request a pre-assessment conference with the IRS Office of Appeals. Following this step, if the IRS determines that the employer owes the employer shared responsibility payment, it will issue a notice and demand for payment (Notice CP 220J). Employers that fail to respond to either Letter 226J or Letter 227 will also be issued a notice and demand for payment. Employers making shared responsibility payments to the IRS will not be able to deduct them on their tax returns. 

Employers can reduce their exposure for penalties by ensuring that the IRS has accurate information about their plans via the Health Insurance Marketplace and Forms 1095-C and 1094-C.

Health Insurance Marketplace. When employees enroll in Marketplace coverage, they are asked whether they are offered ACA-compliant health coverage by their employers. The Marketplace will mail the employer a notice indicating that a given employee is eligible for  premium tax credits for health insurance and that the employer may be subject to a penalty for not offering the employee ACA-compliant coverage. The notice will contain details about how the employer can appeal the premium tax credit determination. Marketplace notices are separate and independent from the IRS Letters 226J and 227 so different appeal processes apply. An employer has 90 days to respond and can include evidence in the appeal that it did offer the employee ACA-compliant coverage. An appeal judge may request a hearing or additional documentation prior to making a decision on the appeal. Large employers are advised to respond promptly to Marketplace notices to correct any misinformation the Marketplace has about an employee’s coverage.

Forms 1095-C and 1094-C. For 2015 and later years, large employers are required to file Forms 1095-C and 1094-C with the IRS to report whether an ACA-compliant health plan was offered to all full-time employees. The forms are complex and an error on the forms could provide inaccurate information about the employer’s workforce or plans to the IRS, thus triggering a penalty. Employers are encouraged to use care when preparing the forms and to file corrected forms if needed.

Transition relief

Transition relief for 2015 plan years only applies to employers meeting certain requirements. Here is a brief summary of some types of transition relief:

  • Employers with 50-99 full-time employees (including full-time equivalents) in 2014 that meet special rules may be exempt from employer shared responsibility payments for 2015. 
  • Employers with non-calendar-year plans had until the first day of the plan year that began in 2015 to comply with the ACA standards if certain requirements were met.
  • Employers that did not offer coverage to dependent children may be exempt for 2015 from penalties for failing to offer this coverage. 

Action required

To address the shared responsibility payment rules, employers should take the following actions:

  • Learn more about the rules through the resources available on the ACA Information Center for Applicable Large Employers (ALEs)
  • Review ownership structures and perform an annual aggregated group analysis to determine which companies are in an aggregated group
  • Identify each large employer based on employee counts in the prior calendar year
  • Determine and document each employee’s full-time or part-time status by month based on ACA criteria
  • Determine if the health plan meets the minimum essential coverage, minimum value and affordability standards and consider any needed health plan design changes
  • Understand the potential penalty exposure if the health plan is not ACA-compliant
  • File accurate Forms 1095-C and 1094-C
  • Respond to Health Insurance Marketplace notices as needed
  • Respond promptly to the IRS upon receipt of a Letter 226J and visit Understanding your Letter 226-J for more information 

AUTHORS


How can we help you?

Contact us by phone 800.274.3978 or
submit your questions, comments, or proposal requests.



Events/Webcasts

IN-PERSON EVENT

The road ahead: Innovation in Detroit and beyond

  • January 18, 2018

LIVE WEBCAST

Nonprofit webcast series: Developing your planned giving strategy

  • January 17, 2018